Biosynthesis Computing Center
About US Biosynthesis Research Science Teams Computed Guidance
Home
About Center
SBU Background
News & Events
Product Development
Foundational Sciences
Research Thrust
Research Activity
Science Team
Cancer Team
Cancer Treatments


Incidence-Specific Cure Guidance

Cancer Curative-Medications Guidance

As has been shown, a Cancer Forensic Map enables the discovery of the Defect Stressor biologic of a cancer which can be given general representation:

 
 Eq. 1

in which the letter 'D' represents the defective biologic

Admittedly, medications are administered as some cancer treatments in attempts to cure the awry-metabolism. Often though, the treatment are trial and error, and may consists of cocktail of other tried medications based on reports filed with Cancer Registries both at the State and federal levels being uninformed of the specificity of the defective biologic, in those unguided medications, the drugs chemicals may not specifically bond with the Defect Stressor, and may even potentially also bond the any of the neighboring biologics and as not have curative effect as desired.

However, as observed, having knowledge of the defective biologic offers opportunity for treatment with only such drugs that can be pre-determined --through metabolic reaction studies; as having the potential for specifically bonding with the Defect Stressor, and therefore more likely to disrupt the prevailing of the cancer

So then, of significant interest is the utilizing of the knowledge of the Defect Stressor in conjunction with medication to the end of obtaining a cure of cancer; in effect establishing from amongst several treatment options, the medication, M, that bonds directly with the Defect Stressor, D such as to break up the condensation reaction bonds to D, "...UDU...";

 
 Eq. 2

or, if the two neighboring biologics, B react with the medication, M, then should be such that also disables the effect of the defective gene, D, by breakup of at least one bond of condensation reaction:

 
 Eq. 3

such as empowers medical professionals informed with and on the specificity of drugs metabolism to confidently effectively prescribe curative medication. The bonding of the medication, M, to each of the biologics is made relative smaller to emphasize that the mechanism may not necessarily be obtaining from bio-condensation. reactions

The opportunity to be guided with the knowledge of the Defect Stressor, such as the Computing Center can proffer with computational Cancer Forensic Maps coupled with bioactivity Biological Thermodynamics, therefore is a key step towards evolving medication-based cures for all types of cancers

Medicating Cancer Genome
Current Research Activity
Cancer Target: Colorectal Cancer
Ref. Cocktail
: Publication -Public Domain
Designer:
Object: Defective Gene Identify
Status: On-going
Proprietary: No
Access: HealthCare Medicals Guidance

Cocktail Reference may change with further formalism


Developing Cancer Treatment Guidance involving the administering of medication, the representative operational genome is generated with the Genome Facility, and several the assessments performed on the genome collective to ascertain the curativeness of the medication, subject to the cancer co-opting of new cells by infiltration as well as reproduction of bona fides cancer cells.

The primarily consideration would be the effectiveness with which the medication limits the paths of growth of the cancer cells. In that sense, an essential goal would be to stem or interrupt more than half of those paths to keep the replication rate low. Yet at the core of this consideration lies the need to inhibit the replication of the defective genes effectively stemming the ignition of the cancer cells. Then, of course, just as importantly there is the need for disabling the cell maintenance function.

Accordingly given the need for this multi-prong attack, the medication of assessment often is and suggested to be a drug cocktail, such that several paths can be simultaneously interrupted for most effectiveness.

The effectiveness of the medication is further improved with the determination of the size of the cancer, and whether the cancer is of tumour or dendrite form for the purposes of determining the extent of tunneling through the capillaries between cells to reach into the interior of the cancer mass. This determination is critical to the end of evaluating the efficacy of the medicating in terms of quantity per dosage and frequency of dosage.

As such the cytoplasm morphology of the cancers is evaluated so the Cancer Treatment Guidance is better informed on administering the cocktail with respect to the rate of delivery into the cell versus reproduction and also of the frequency of medicating versus cell growth. Of course, the administering regime is further refined with evaluation of the delivery process -- if the treatment finds effect mostly within a narrow concentric band at the surface and so inducing remission by superficial inward-directed decrement of the size, or the cancer-wide pervasive medicating of constituent biologics of the genome inducing phagism of the defective gene consequent on facilitated drug conjugates delivery into the cells

Effectively, the Cancer Treatment Guidance that obtains proffers such a specifications the efficacy of the drug-cocktail, the administering regime, estimated time-span of care, identity of the role of the cocktail substances and the internal recycling factor, and dosage frequency significance.


Biosynthesis Computing Center
An EnhKnow
TM Strategic Business Unit
About Center
Center Background
 
Legals
Privacy
Terms of Use
Copyright 2023 Biosynthesis Computing Center, an SBU of Enhance Knowledge LLC; All Rights Reserved